Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5160
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Mousumi G.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-20T09:57:19Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-20T09:57:19Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-01-
dc.identifier.issn09721452-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5160-
dc.descriptionPage- 67 to 71en_US
dc.description.abstractI certainly feel myself to be in a perplexing condition of an angst given the fact that there already exists a sizeable oeuvre of writings on the philosophy of literature and demonstration of such a relationship in varied literary and performative works and representations. Any attempt to begin a discussion on the very category of ‘literature’ is, more often than not, confounding since it has been looked at and approached in different ways that include conceptualizations like ‘criticism’, ‘metacriticism’, ‘literary criticism’, ‘critical theory’, ‘critical philosophy’, ‘literary history’, ‘literary theory’, ‘poetics' ‘hermeneutics’ and so on. Again, literature has also been analysed from multifarious vantage points including those of the social, sometimes the sociological, the historical, the political, the cultural, the psychological, the psychoanalytical, the linguistic, the rhetorical and the stylistic.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Advanced Study,Shimlaen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectLiteratureen_US
dc.subjectSociologicalen_US
dc.titlePhilosophy and Literature: A Discussion on the Two Contiguous Facets of the Concept of ‘Truth’ About Knowledgeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Summerhill, Vol.25, No.2, (2019)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
01 Summerhill Article.10.pdf264.54 kBAdobe PDF Preview PDF


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.