Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5039
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Misra, R.N. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-16T11:41:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-16T11:41:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1998-12-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 09721452 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5039 | - |
dc.description | Page- 22 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The post-Gupta phase of Indian art, termed as 'medieval', has generally been represented as a phase of decline in the quality of sculpture, both in form and imagery. This perception partially flows from valorization of the antiquity factor, which constitutes the ''ancient' as qualitatively superior to the periods that followed. In that order, the early phase of Indian sculpture, roughly between the post-Mauryan times and the end of the Gupta period (c. 550 AD) is underscored as a period of innovation: when inconographies were creatively evolved, forms perfected, and classicism prevailed ubiquitously. These conclusions make sense eminently but problems arise when, in comparison, medieval Indian art is perceived as imitative, stereotyped, and bereft of purity of style or evocative imagery. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Advanced Study,Shimla | en_US |
dc.subject | Temple Sculpture | en_US |
dc.subject | Secular Motifs | en_US |
dc.subject | Iconography. | en_US |
dc.title | Medieval Craftsmanship in Stone | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Summerhill, Vol.4, No.2, (1998) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vol- 4, No.- 2, 1998 Article.7.pdf | 1.17 MB | Adobe PDF | Preview PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.