Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5015
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Elliot, Anthony | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-16T06:50:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-16T06:50:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0972-1452 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5015 | - |
dc.description | Page no. - 8 & 9 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Is the future Freudian? Or are we going to witness the dismantling of psychoanalysis in favor of discourses that will bear only an etiolated relationship to the foundational texts of Sigmund Freud? And, most importantly, has the very success of psychoanalysis been its failure? Has the percolation of psychoanalysis into the cultural unconscious made it impossible as a form of therapy? What must Freudians do to render psychoanalysis into the radical practice that it once was? | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Discourses | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychoanalysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Violent | en_US |
dc.title | Is the future Freudian? | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Summerhill, Vol.6, No.1, (2000) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Book review) Article-3 (Vol.- 6, No. - 1, 2000-5.pdf | 2.07 MB | Adobe PDF | Preview PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.