Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4624
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRay, Manas
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-07T09:12:41Z
dc.date.available2020-07-07T09:12:41Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn09721401
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4624
dc.descriptionpage no. 269-277en_US
dc.description.abstractPerhaps it would not be altogether unacceptable to suggest that throughout the 1970s, Foucault was found struggling in intellectual directions not easily reconcilable. Consequently, his positions on the law (developed mostly during this phase) show a measure of inconsistent cy1. Critical scholarship on Foucault's law has so far progressed in two opposed theses: expulsion and retrieval. The first suggests that Foucault views modern power as driven not by codes of law but by codes of normalization. In other words, it would argue that Foucault subscribes to the progressive attenuation of law (read as juridieo-political) by the two exclusively modern forms of power: discipline and biopolitics.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimlaen_US
dc.subjectFoucaulten_US
dc.subjectFoucault's views
dc.titleBetween determination and responsiveness : a third space in Foucaulten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences (SHSS) Vol.16, No.1-2( 2009)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
REVIEW ARTICLE.pdf2.08 MBAdobe PDF Preview PDF


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.