Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4577Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Govind, Rahul | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-06T11:30:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-06T11:30:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 09721401 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4577 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The relationship between thought and history is a difficult one. To use thought as a marker of (historical) change is precarious, fraught with self-contradictory possibilities, suicidal. If thought has to be so thought it would be sequestered ñ to mark ñ in a time of discrete parts. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla | en_US |
| dc.title | Imagination and Freedom: Bhattacharyya, Heidegger And The Kantian Inheritance | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences (SHSS) Vol.20, No.1,2013 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.pdf | 105.7 kB | Adobe PDF | Preview PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.