Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4319Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ram-Prasad, Chakra Varthi | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-02T11:25:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-02T11:25:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4319 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper focuses on a critique of a powerful and widely' held classical Indian theory of the role of perception in the acquisition of knowledge. I will only give an outline of the issues and a bare reconstruction of the arguments; practically all these arguments and the dozens that I do not consider here, merit more detaj)ed and systematic development in the light of contemporary work on perceptual knowledge. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Advanced Study ,Shimla | en_US |
| dc.subject | Nyaya and Mimasa | en_US |
| dc.title | Immediacy and the Direct THeory of Perception: | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Problems from Sri Harsa | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences (SHSS) Vol.3, No.2 (1996) | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.pdf | 5.31 MB | Adobe PDF | Preview PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.